Hi Moe,

I can address two of your issues. First, The issue with the _embedded
JPEG file being preferred to the sister JPEG in a RAW+JPEG pair has
been addressed in several recent commits. Second, we do have an
outstanding ticket to combine and separate RAW+JPEG pairs here:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4040. Would this give you most of the
functionality you need?

Cheers,
Lucas

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Moe Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for the next version of shotwell, will there be any option to re-combine
> RAW+JPEG?
>
> I'm looking forward to shotwell 0.14 with the recent RAW fixes. I'm also
> trying the shotwell development ppa on a non production machine with a copy
> of my photo database. So far, things seem to improve, thanks a lot for
> taking up development again for this great photo management application!
>
> But my old photo database is a bit messed up. Often, RAW and JPEG are not
> properly paired. In some cases, the embedded JPEG has been extracted and
> been used instead of the Camera developed JPEG which was beside the RAW
> file. As for now, there does seem to be good handling for new imports from
> camera, while I cannot find a way to re-combine old RAW+JPEG pairs and get
> rid of the _embedded version.
>
> I really hope, there will be something to handle this old photos. I do not
> understand why shotwell uses the embedded version as development at all
> (except for the thumbnail).
>
> Best
> Moe
> _______________________________________________
> Shotwell mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

Reply via email to