Hi Lucas, thanks for your answer. #4040 could be fine for that purpose. To be more precise, I don't need to combine/separate RAW+JPEGs day-to-day but rather want to fix my photo database as soon as the recent RAW+JPEG fixes are in the new stable version of shotwell.
I face the situation, where I have already imported RAW+JPEGs, where the RAW is paired with the _embedded or the _shotwell development. On file system it looks something like: P0001.ORF P0001_ORF.jpg (which was originally P0001.JPG) P0001_embedded.jpg P0001_shotwell.jpg Sometimes the Camera sister JPG appears beside the RAW inside shotwell, sometimes not. I can investigate more on that later. But I think, a simple tool would be great where I can point for the RAW file to a certain JPEG. E.g. "Manuelly select developed JPG" or "Manually select Camera developed JPEG". On the one hand I could use this to fix my db, on the other hand I could use it to set a darktable or ufraw developed JPEG as the developed version. best Moe 2013/2/4 Lucas Beeler <[email protected]> > Hi Moe, > > I can address two of your issues. First, The issue with the _embedded > JPEG file being preferred to the sister JPEG in a RAW+JPEG pair has > been addressed in several recent commits. Second, we do have an > outstanding ticket to combine and separate RAW+JPEG pairs here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4040. Would this give you most of the > functionality you need? > > Cheers, > Lucas > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Moe Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > for the next version of shotwell, will there be any option to re-combine > > RAW+JPEG? > > > > I'm looking forward to shotwell 0.14 with the recent RAW fixes. I'm also > > trying the shotwell development ppa on a non production machine with a > copy > > of my photo database. So far, things seem to improve, thanks a lot for > > taking up development again for this great photo management application! > > > > But my old photo database is a bit messed up. Often, RAW and JPEG are not > > properly paired. In some cases, the embedded JPEG has been extracted and > > been used instead of the Camera developed JPEG which was beside the RAW > > file. As for now, there does seem to be good handling for new imports > from > > camera, while I cannot find a way to re-combine old RAW+JPEG pairs and > get > > rid of the _embedded version. > > > > I really hope, there will be something to handle this old photos. I do > not > > understand why shotwell uses the embedded version as development at all > > (except for the thumbnail). > > > > Best > > Moe > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- Moe Blue _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
