On 16 May 2013, at 19:35, Jim Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I can't see any obvious reason why Shotwell (set in Preferences as the >> default developer) shouldn't have developed all of the images. >> >> There's probably some simple explanation… > > Without looking into the code, it may be that the developed JPEGs are only > regenerated when you view (double-click) the photo. Shotwell should > eventually develop those images, whether due to user action or background > process. > > -- Jim
Thanks, Jim. I've left Shotwell running all day, but no more JPG files have been generated. I've also run through the whole event by double-clicking on the first thumbnail and displaying it in full-screen size, and then right-arrowing through from beginning to end. Still there are only seven JPG files in this directory. I shouldn't complain, because there is no apparent performance hit, and I'm saving a lot of disc space, but I'm worried that I might have to pay for this seemingly free lunch in the end! I'm going to be away from home for a couple of weeks, will continue to investigate this oddity when I get back. Michael _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
