Am Samstag, 28. August 2010, 16:18:01 schrieb Davide Scaini: > First: thanks for your reply :) > > Il giorno sab, 28/08/2010 alle 14.13 +0200, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann ha > > scritto: > > Am Freitag, 27. August 2010, 21:52:48 schrieb Davide Scaini: > > > Not a flame, just my opinion over last changes > > > (improvements/regressions). If you think that my opinions are too > > > strong I'm sorry. I appreciate the work of everyone in OSS but I think > > > that it's necessary to discuss and share opinions to find and develop > > > the best ideas. > > > > > > -(guess) kernel related things: > > > -- no shutdown pressing button for 7-8 seconds (as it was before); i > > > think > > > > > > it's necessary because somethimes freezes. > > > > > > -- faster than ever! just incredible! bootup and graphics are really > > > > > > faster. Graphis it's still unstable... some glitches after resuming > > > from suspend. > > > > > > -illume2 sucks! sorry... > > > not only aesthetically (no great differences from 1, but this wasn't > > > what i expected/needed) > > > > > > i'm talking about user experience: > > > -- switching between apps -> two touchs against one (in illume1), that > > > to > > > > > > me means two times slower than before > > > > > > -- switching between apps -> no more apps list ... this is absolutely > > > > > > useful > > > > > > -- no more shelf gadgets like wifi/bluetooth indicators... so I have > > > no > > > > > > idea when I'm connected via wifi or not... this is just crazy. (it > > > would be great to switch on/off directly from shelf) > > > > > > I can't understand why there is no more possibility to select illume1 > > > on shr (but i'm sure there's a valid reason since I blindly trust shr > > > people) > > > > This is due to the fact that you can't *build* both in the same tree... > > and old illume1 is abbandoned for more than a year I think. > > but afair even the next to last release there were the choice between > shr-illume1 and shr-illume2 at first boot, now it's missing. It *was* possible to build both. And that changed - and that's why we're left with one of them now.
> I know that the code is not developed anymore because Rasterman decided > to revrite all illume code giving birth to illume2... and it's about a > year taht illume2 is kind of birth but not growth. > From the brilliant Raster I expected: > - as he said a complete rewrite of the code... ok, personally I > - great innovation in interface, some new concept... > - awsomeness everywhere ;) (he said he had a great project with a great > company...) No idea, if it was raster's decision to do that... But for sure I know that it's not raster himself doing the rewrite. The 'trick' about illume2 is that every part is modular and can be exchanged. Just needs someone to step up and write what we want... volunteers? ;) > > > So either we put some effort into illume2 to fix the annoying issues or > > we put some effort into some alternative (which you probably prefer ;). > > personally I think that hackable:1 stuff is great. It works. It has a > nice pim management... but unfortunately is not as comfortable as shr > is... maybe the integration of fso in rev6 will give the right spin to > the project and distro. (just speculation, i prefere to talk about > usability) > > > And yes, I have to agree that I'm far from being satisfied with it either > > :/ > > > > > Hope this helps to discuss and improve our experience :) > > > (and I hope to be helpful) > > > d > > I stress the fact that I want to help in some way... > d -- Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
