Matt Lepinski wrote:
Therefore, I was wondering if there was consensus that the ROA format should be changed to allow multiple signatures?
Like Sandy, I support this change to the ROA format. I can envisage situations where a holder's address space is certified in a number of certificates, yet the join of this address space describes a single advertised prefix. In this case there is no way in the currently described ROA format that the ROA can be formed.
Geoff _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
