Re: [sidr] Controlling routing (was Re: WG Chair Affiliation)

[Terry Manderson]

On 8/10/09 11:14 AM, "Danny McPherson" <da...@tcb.net> wrote:


>> 
>> But what decision should the relying party make? in other words how
>> does the
>> relying party know that collision was intentional?
> 
> I'd think it wouldn't matter with the RP, if the ROAs
> are there then accept those prefixes from the specified
> Origin AS - even if multiple - i.e., doesn't a valid
> ROA imply it was intentional ;-)
> 

Sorry, my response was poorly worded.

My position is that we probably shouldn't allow a system into play that can
produce a fully ambiguous result.

T.

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr