On 8/10/09 12:04 PM, "Danny McPherson" <da...@tcb.net> wrote:

> 
> But that's not what I said - I said to make this work you'd
> have the EE ("owner") issue two ROAs, one for each origin -

yes. but predicated on one owner and not two. I think we are at the same
place :-)

> there's still only one "owner" at any given instant and that
> "owner" would surely work with the acquiring or acquired entities
> to accommodate such a request -- if routing the prefix(es) in
> question required this.
> 

Yes.

> This seems straight-forward to me..

yes.. I think I must have misinterpreted your direction, I thought you were
wanting overlapping validity.

Terry

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to