At Fri, 8 Oct 2010 23:03:19 +1100, Geoff Huston wrote: > > If I scrub the HTTPS constructs from the draft what I'm left with > are "naked" CMS objects
I would have thought we'd be left with CMS objects wrapped in HTTP, replacing CMS objects wrapped in HTTPS. Strictly speaking, what we're doing here is removing the TLS encapsulation of HTTP. > (and they look a lot like rpki-signed objects, but they are not > signed by keys certified by rpki certificates so I guess that > technically they are NOT spki-signed-objects). Different CMS eContentType OIDs too: 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.24 id-ct-routeOriginAttestation 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.26 id-ct-rpkiManifest 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.28 id-ct-xml _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
