I have read the document, like what it says and how it says it.
I support it moving forward, as it is.

Brian

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Two folks seem to have given this a read-through, is that all the
> interest that exists? is documenting how originators of routes ought
> to think/use/abuse RPKI not something we should do here?
>
> please chime in if you've given this a read and are onboard with it
> moving forward.
>
> -chris
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote:
>>>> What's the rationale of this change from version 10 to 11?
>>> after much discussion with ops and security folk, it is the purpose of
>>> the whole exercise.  you wanna stop 7007?
>>
>> fwiw, it has swung back and forth a few times
>>
>> randy
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to