Hi,
I have read, and I support moving this forward.
Jay B.
Christopher Morrow writes:
> Two folks seem to have given this a read-through, is that all the
> interest that exists? is documenting how originators of routes ought
> to think/use/abuse RPKI not something we should do here?
>
> please chime in if you've given this a read and are onboard with it
> moving forward.
>
> -chris
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote:
> >>> What's the rationale of this change from version 10 to 11?
> >> after much discussion with ops and security folk, it is the purpose of
> >> the whole exercise. you wanna stop 7007?
> >
> > fwiw, it has swung back and forth a few times
> >
> > randy
> > _______________________________________________
> > sidr mailing list
> > sidr@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> >
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
