On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Christopher Morrow <christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels <t...@ripe.net> wrote: > >> As I stated before I prefer to have the extra time during, or next to, an >> IETF -- I already planned to attend those. So the extra meeting in Vancouver >> works for me. I understand that a higher frequency is good for momentum but >> extra travel is not possible for me and remote attendance is not ideal. >> > > summarizing a constant thrum.... > "Yes, not everyone can make every interim proposed. Yes not everyone > can make the virtual version of same. That is ok..."
being slightly less flip (I didn't actually mean to be flip): The 2 questions here are: 1) are more meetings required/helpful 2) would having these coincident with existing events and ~1/month be acceptable to the majority we (everyone involved) do know that not everyone can make every meeting... aiming for best participation level is the goal. -chris > Thanks for the info though! > -chris > <co-chair> _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
