> 2) would having these coincident with existing events and ~1/month > be acceptable to the majority > > we (everyone involved) do know that not everyone can make every > meeting... aiming for best participation level is the goal. > > -chris >
[WEG] Avoiding some number of messages saying "can't/can attend x, y, z" is exactly why I requested that the chairs use a doodle poll or similar to gather that feedback (a bit more quietly), especially when there is more than one alternative for a date (before vs after an event, for example). You're asking for feedback, which is good, but you've still pre-set the dates, which really isn't aiming for best participation level. It's simply giving people an opportunity to throw rocks, and hope that enough people throw rocks of the same shape to change the schedule as necessary. For example, although it means I have to give up more weekend for travel, I'd rather see us go on the front side of NANOG. I am unlikely to be able to do anything not World V6 launch related on June 6, and I'd bet I'm not the only one. Wes George This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
