>> well, actually, the discussion in april was walking around many of >> the implications thereof. it is hard to discuss "do we keep/replace >> AS[4]_PATH" as it is abstract and draws deep philosophical discourse >> with no hard handles on technical decision points. > > I think you should remove the [4] from the discussion. 4 bytes ASN is > mandatory for BGPSEC speakers. So, there should be no AS4_PATH > attributes between BGPSEC routers to keep/replace.
i agree. but every time i say AS_PATH someone whacks me with AS4_PATH. maybe this is why i like the NO_EXPLICIT_PATH :) randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
