I do not intend to review this document in it's current state and am confused how we can WG LC it while the threat and [presumably subsequent] requirements documents are still being developed by the WG.
I would like an explanation from the chairs regarding what the intention is here. -danny On Sep 20, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Danny McPherson wrote: > > Sandy, > I don't understand how we can WG LC this document when the requirements > document isn't complete, and the requirements document isn't complete because > we're still working out the threats document. > > Can you explain the logic here? > > -danny > > On Sep 15, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote: > >> This starts a working group last call for >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05. The draft is available at >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 and >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol/ >> >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for publication. >> Send end comments to the list. >> >> The WGLC will end on 29 September 2012. >> >> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> sidr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
