Discussion yes, revisions, not so much, and in particular, -threats is not done. WGLC is inappropriate prior to -threats completion in WG.
Plus, -threats has not adequately accommodated criticism. Doing s/BGPSEC/ANOTHER_NAME/g does not qualify as "substantive", IMHO. There was no review post -05 publication. Review prior to that point is not relevant, IMHO. At a minimum, those whose comments were in theory addressed, should be given the opportunity, each and every one of them, to speak up and be heard. It is the job of the chairs to track issues and confirm with commentators that revisions are adequate. I am not a chair. Brian On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Brian Dickson > <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't believe it is at all appropriate to WGLC a document prior to > > substantive review and maturity. > > it's on it's 5th revision, with substantive discussion along the way... >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
