Apologies for taking so long to review this document. This is a well constructed template and I have only 6 concerns to be addressed.
1) My first observation is that the CPS takes an organisational view (and that is expected) of the RPKI CA's in action, and while it certainly provides allowances for multiple CA's within an organisation (s 1.3.1) There are situations that the 'organisation' will have different personalities. To which I would like "organisation" to also explicitly include wording that includes 'business unit.' 2) In section 1.3.5, "Specify the entity that operates" Entity should most definitely be plural. Yes, I accept that is a little(?) picky. 3) Nit: Section 1.6 Page 11. There appears to be an extra "<tab>-" in the definition if ISP, NIR, and RPKI-signed object. 4) Section 2.1 "via RSYNC". Can that be adjusted to "standardised mechanisms supported by RPKI"? or something similar? 5) In section 4.1.1, can "Any subscriber who holds..", be amended to "Any vetted and approved subscriber who holds.." 6) Can you explain why compromise and disaster recovery (s5.7) was omitted from the template? Cheers Terry On 22/02/13 2:30 PM, "Chris Morrow" <morr...@ops-netman.net> wrote: >WG folks, >As the subject states, let's please start a WGLC poll for the document: > draft-ietf-sidr-cps-01 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-cps-01> > >with the abstract: > "This document contains a template to be used for creating a > Certification Practice Statement (CPS) for an Organization that is > part of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), e.g., a > resource allocation registry or an ISP." > >So far the authors have made a few revisions, with updates based on >comments/feedback, at this time the document has been stable for more >than 6 months time, let's move this along if there are no further >issues/addendums/questions/appendixes. > >thanks! >-chris >co-chair-1-of-3 >_______________________________________________ >sidr mailing list >sidr@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
