On Jul 15, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Stephen Kent <k...@bbn.com<mailto:k...@bbn.com>> 
wrote:

Randy's view is that it is preferable to engineer a single solution that is 
agnostic
about whether the address space is in use or not, even if that is a more complex
solution. His rationale seems to be that its safer to treat all space as in 
use, so as
to avoid the damage to users that arises if the entity transferring the space 
can't
properly classify it properly.

Isn’t the “unused” scenario what we have today? Why do we need a solution for 
something that is already being accomplished?

-andy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to