> Randy's view is that it is preferable to engineer a single solution > that is agnostic about whether the address space is in use or not, > even if that is a more complex solution. His rationale seems to be > that its safer to treat all space as in use, so as to avoid the damage > to users that arises if the entity transferring the space can't > properly classify it properly.
thank you for putting words in my mouth, especially as they are the correct words :) > Isn’t the “unused” scenario what we have today? Why do we need a > solution for something that is already being accomplished? in steve's model, one has to implement both. job security for engineers :) randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
