At Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:18:00 -0300, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > I don't know exactly either, but this from 2026: > > " A Proposed Standard specification is generally stable, has resolved > known design choices, is believed to be well-understood, has received > significant community review, and appears to enjoy enough community > interest to be considered valuable. However, further experience > might result in a change or even retraction of the specification > before it advances." > > doesn't: > 1) say anything about the 'Final and Ultimate Solution' > 2) that other work can't be done
Exactly. Enough people seem to think this is a promising approach to merit PS status. The fact that there are also people who don't want to use it doesn't change that. Go for PS and move on. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
