Dear Alexandre,
I think you can include vectorisation, as it speeds up many operations.
If you encounter important discrepancies between your vectorised
results and those of the Tests
subdirectory (not vectorised!) send me the arch.make and a copy of the
vectorised outputs.
Cheers,
Eduardo
On 19/02/2008, at 11:25, Alexandre Lebon wrote:
Dear Siesta Users,
I made make the compilation of siesta both in sequential and
parallel version on a computational center. The engeneer compiled
siesta with intel fortran version 10.
I repeat her words:
"Using '-O' gives '-O2' which includes vectorisation.
(intel compiler version 9.1's -O does not contain vectorisation but
intel compiler
version 10.1 's -O, yes)
So please make sure that all the numbers are ok.
If not I will recompile without vectorisation option.
I can try -O3 too."
My question is concerned with the compilation that includes
vectorisation as it exhibits discrepancies when compared to the
results of the Tests of siesta.
Would you incorporate vectorisation in the compilation or leave it??
Many thanks in advance,
Alexandre
