Dear QingGuo
you can try Intel compiler l_fce_pc_8.1.027.tar.gz （4/15/2005）and l_cce_pc_8.1.027.tar.gz（4/15/2005）
This version of Intel compiler fixed the bug.
I have compiler parallel siesta on Opteron 64 Linux and Em64T Linux by
this version.
8.1.027 is more stable .......
you can find this version at Intel Premier Web https://premier.intel.com
good luck
Óscar Paz 提到:
Dear QingGuo,
I think this is caused by an error in the Intel compiler. Although the
syntax of the line is correct as is, I changed the single quotes around
brackets by double quotes and it compiled succesfully.
Sincerely, Óscar.-
QingGuo Feng wrote:
Dear all,
I have met an installation problem, and even though I have read the
archives, I found no similar reports.
When I tried to compile the siesta code on my dual opteron amd 64
machine with intel em64t compiler 8.1 and Math Kernel Library
7.2 under SUSE operation system, I get the following error message:
fortcom: Error: atom.f, line 4485: Unbalanced parentheses
. nsm=1,nsemic(l)+1-(cnfigtb(l,nsemic(l)+1,is)-config(l)))
--------------------------------------------------------------------^
fortcom: Error: atom.f, line 4484: Syntax error, found ',' when
expecting
one of: :
. (cnfigtb(l,nsm,is),sym(l),'(',qPAO(l,nsm),')',
----------------------------------^
fortcom: Error: atom.f, line 4484: Syntax error, found ''' when
expecting
one of: ( * :: , <IDENTIFIER> <CHAR_CON_KIND_PARAM>
<CHAR_NAM_KIND_PARAM>
<CHARACTER_CONSTANT> ...
. (cnfigtb(l,nsm,is),sym(l),'(',qPAO(l,nsm),')',
----------------------------------------------------------^
compilation aborted for atom.f (code 1)
make: *** [atom.o] Error 1
It seems there is no syntax error in this _expression_ (atom.f, lines
4483-4485).I have thought whether it's caused by the strict format of
fortran. But it does not work when I delete some space in the
continued line so as to ensure the _expression_ is in the region from
column 7 to column 72 or compile with lower optimization option -O0. In
fact when I compile the code on a 32-bit machine with Intel 32-bit
compiler 8.1 and corresponding 32-bit Math Kernel Library, it goes
through
successfully and does not show this message. Has anybody met this
problem
too? Or can anybody give me some possible explanation for this problem
and
suggestions to solve it?
Thanks.
By the way, I attached my used arch.make here:
SIESTA_ARCH=intel-mkl
#
# Intel fortran compiler for linux with mkl optimized blas and lapack
#
# Be sure to experiment with different optimization options.
# You have quite a number of combinations to try...
#
FC=ifort
#
FFLAGS= -w -mp -tpp5 -O3
#this default options works well for 32-bit machine
FFLAGS_DEBUG= -g
LDFLAGS= -Vaxlib
COMP_LIBS= /opt/lib/libgoto.so ./xerbla.o
RANLIB=echo
#
NETCDF_LIBS=
NETCDF_INTERFACE=
DEFS_CDF=
#
MPI_INTERFACE=
MPI_INCLUDE=
DEFS_MPI=
#
GUIDE=/opt/intel/mkl72/lib/em64t/libguide.a
LAPACK=/opt/intel/mkl72/lib/em64t/libmkl_lapack.a
BLAS=/opt/intel/mkl72/lib/em64t/libmkl_em64t.a
#G2C=/usr/lib64/libg2c.a
LIBS=$(LAPACK) $(BLAS) $(G2C) $(GUIDE) -lpthread
SYS=bsd
DEFS= $(DEFS_CDF) $(DEFS_MPI)
#
.F.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(DEFS) $<
f.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $<
.F90.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(DEFS) $<
.f90.o:
$(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $<
#
Best regards
Q. Feng
----------------------
Institut fuer Theoretische Physik
J. W. Goethe Universitaet
D-60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
|
