Hi Randy
Just a couple of references - inline
>>>> On 6/09/2016, 10:35, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote:
hi:
this kludge is not very well thought out.
not that i am advocating, but an ietfish approach would be a requirement
to have attended n previous meetings. makes more sense to me than this
proposal. but ...
The NRO NC election process a similar requirement.
<snip>Individuals who are on site and are registered for either the current
APNIC Conference they are attending, or have been registered for at least one
previous APNIC Conference since APNIC 10, are entitled to one vote.</snip>
https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/elections/nro-elections/nro-election-process
Voting in EC elections is restricted to Members.
https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/elections/ec/voting/who-can-vote
personally, i am not sure there is a real problem. so what if the old
guard gets thrown out and some new unknown folk get elected. it might
be a breath of fresh air. what actual damage could some fresh blood do?
some radical change in apnic across the board just might benefit the
internet.
[ historical note: this descends from the first taipei meeting, where
there were no voting restrictions. a bunch of folk showed up just for
the ec election and voted in an outsider, shock and horror! of
course, all sorts of rules and restrictions to protect the old guard
were immediately put in place. ]
randy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
