Randy, >personally, i am not sure there is a real problem. so what if the old >guard gets thrown out and some new unknown folk get elected. it might >be a breath of fresh air. what actual damage could some fresh blood do? >some radical change in apnic across the board just might benefit the >internet.
If new unknown folk is a choice of the community, it is fine and I don't see any problem. However, the problem I'm trying to fix is someone can manipulate the community's view by inviting several persons who never and will not involve the community discussion after the election. (I'm always expecting new and fresh blood to Policy SIG Chair) Regards, Matt 2016-09-06 9:35 GMT+09:00 Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com>: > hi: > > this kludge is not very well thought out. > > not that i am advocating, but an ietfish approach would be a requirement > to have attended n previous meetings. makes more sense to me than this > proposal. but ... > > personally, i am not sure there is a real problem. so what if the old > guard gets thrown out and some new unknown folk get elected. it might > be a breath of fresh air. what actual damage could some fresh blood do? > some radical change in apnic across the board just might benefit the > internet. > > [ historical note: this descends from the first taipei meeting, where > there were no voting restrictions. a bunch of folk showed up just for > the ec election and voted in an outsider, shock and horror! of > course, all sorts of rules and restrictions to protect the old guard > were immediately put in place. ] > > randy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
