Norman Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm going to have to disagree about Hackers. I think you guys are
> viewing it from the wrong perspective. It is quite accurate - but not
> in a literal sense. A lot of people complain, for example, that the
> computer images in the movie were totally unrealistic. True, but if
> you view them a representation of what the hacker sees inside his
> head, I think it is a pretty fair. On top of that, the quirky
> personalities, egos and general attitude are pretty much on track.
>
> Sure, many of the technical details are wrong, but the truth is that
> the "real" version would be quite boring. Watching the real thing
> would be about as interesting as watching someone pick their nose.
>
> It's no wargames, but it is one of the better hacker movies. Unless
> perhaps you'd prefer "The Net"? :)
I disagree, utterly and completely. Of course, I think I have a little bias,
but anyone that uses Chris Goggins and god in the same sentance (in a
complimentary manner) should be shot.
I have a confession to make. I have never seen it. I actually refuse to watch
it on a moral basis, but I"ve heard reports from many that it is only worth
it because of Angelina. *sigh*
If you want a good hacker movie ... watch sneakers. Or wargames. Or enemy of
the state. Those have actual hacking elements in them, and are realistic.
And I hate to tell you ... but being technically accurate is just about
everything when it comes to hacking. So leaving that out ... is ...
just silly.
Aaron
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
