Hi, On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:11:46AM +0300, Vlad Ivanov wrote: > Data should not be shifted upon transition from CAPTURE-* > to SHIFT-*. TDI is shifted into a register only if the > state at the rising egde of TCK is already SHIFT-*. > > I stumbled upon this while implementing a EJTAG decoder > for MIPS and have tested it with some debugging hardware. > > Relevant stackoverflow post: > https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/342258/is-tdi-shifted-on-move-from-shift-ir-to-exit2-ir-in-jtag > > v2 fixes tabs/spaces mixup
Whitespace is still broken AFAICS, probably easier to attach the file created by "git format-patch HEAD~1" to an email or just ping us with a link to some github clone/commit (here or on IRC). I tried to manually recreate the patch, but a quick test-run (of all the jtag and jtag_stm32 tests in the sigrok-test repo) seems to suggest that it also breaks some decoding which looked valid before, e.g. -4554188-4554225 jtag_stm32: command: "IR: IDCODE" -4554601-4554606 jtag_stm32: field: "Reserved (BS TAP)" "BS" "B" -4554606-4554610 jtag_stm32: field: "Reserved" "Res" "R" -4554638-4554654 jtag_stm32: item: "Continuation code: 0x4" "CC" "C" -4554610-4554638 jtag_stm32: item: "Identity code: 0x3b" "IC" "I" -4554610-4554654 jtag_stm32: field: "Manufacturer: ARM Ltd." "Manuf" "M" -4554654-4554718 jtag_stm32: field: "Part: JTAG-DP" "Part" "P" -4554718-4554735 jtag_stm32: field: "Version: JTAG-DP" "Version" "V" -4554606-4554735 jtag_stm32: command: "IDCODE: 0x3ba00477 (ARM Ltd.: JTAG-DP/JTAG-DP)" +4554188-4554225 jtag_stm32: command: "IR: BYPASS" +4554601-4554735 jtag_stm32: item: "BYPASS: 000000000000000000000000000000000" Or this: -1529159-1529196 jtag_stm32: command: "IR: APACC" -1529217-1529364 jtag_stm32: command: "New transaction: DATA: 0x0, A: 00, RnW: Read request" -1529217-1529364 jtag_stm32: command: "Previous transaction result: DATA: 0x0, ACK: OK/FAULT" +1529159-1529196 jtag_stm32: command: "IR: UNKNOWN" +1529217-1529364 jtag_stm32: command: "Unknown instruction: 00000000000000000000000000000000001" I haven't looked into the details, could be something missing or could be an issue in the stacked jtag_stm32 PD maybe, not sure. Btw, there's a different potential fix for this issue here, maybe you could have a look of whether that one could be relevant as well and/or whether both fixes can be merged or such? https://sigrok.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1066 Another JTAG issue is here (not sure if related), the patch is was not fully working unfortunately, though. https://sigrok.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=842 Cheers, Uwe. -- http://hermann-uwe.de | http://randomprojects.org | http://sigrok.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel