On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, . <svaks...@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

> After I joined, I was astonished when someone linked a photograph and
> also listed Hassath's address on the list in all their friendliness to
> welcome her. I dont know about her but I would have been upset if it
> happened to me, "proper name" and "real person" be damned :)

Ahem, that bit about the address, that would be me, and I think I've
apologized a few times to all parties concerned. It was at least to me
an intellectual exercise in proving a point that went wrong.

Perhaps because the list of members, as Deepa points out, is
semi-transparent, Silk remains the smallish list I joined many years
ago where I knew most people IRL. Of course it is not the case, and
there are all sorts of 'strangers' who read it on the public archives
and never subscribe and all that. If I really paid any attention to
the size of the list and the number of strangers (to me) on it, I
would probably clam up and never participate.

Cheeni

Reply via email to