On Wednesday 2 May 2012 at 5:42 AM, Srini RamaKrishnan wrote:
> If war turns every man into looking out for himself, then what is this
> world we live in, this libertarian machine age of every man for
> himself?


I'd say that is a straw man, except that definitions of libertarianism are all 
over the place nowadays and I'm sure you can find a citation for just such a 
definition.

At least in my book, I don't see anything fundamentally libertarian about 
"every man for himself" or anything essentially anti-libertarian about helping 
out people you feel need your help.  Charity is not anti-libertarian -- your 
property is yours to do as you see fit, and that includes giving it away.  What 
*is* anti-libertarian though, is forcing another man to give up his property 
for a cause which *you* see as a just one.

Venky (the Second).

PS: No, I have no idea how this has anything at all to do with the topic Shiv 
started in this thread, but hey, this is silklist.

Reply via email to