----- Original Message ----- From: Larry <n...@netrus.net> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Sunday, 20 June 1999 09:32 Subject: CS>Anyone used CS inhaled into lungs?
> Hello > > Has anyone had success inhaling CS into the lungs to use against infections? > Larry Please see attached for a protocol as posted by Books Bradley. Very good results!! Ivan.
--- Begin Message ---To all interested list members. I would like to relate an experimental protocol recently developed by one of our younger (and brighter) staff members. He originated the idea and assembled all parts into a working model in less than two days-------after his original inspiration. The original problem manifested as a result of our fruitless search for some effective procedure for attacking the bi-lateral form of those bacterial pneumonias which have proved non-responsive to all of the anti-biotic protocols. This challenge has been especially dear to our hearts since one of our engineers lost his 47 year old wife (a wonderful school teacher), at the age of 47--------nine years ago. We have used this system on 3 volunteers----and this only----within the past four weeks. However, we have been absolutely astounded by the results. One 75 year old ashma sufferer, unable to gain more than momentary relief during the past 8 years, was able to dispense with his very labor-intensive (unbelieveably costly) hospice-assisted protocols............18 days after undertaking this protocol. We now suspect that his ashma was the result of some form of secondary bacterial pathogen......this because of the speed and degree of his recovery. Another of our volunteers (71 years), afflicted with a sub-clinical bronchial infection-----non-responsive to any protocol----including Rife Beam Ray Therapy, has improved by at least 75% within the past 21 days.........and shows every indication of complete resolution within the next week or so. This volunteer was in perfect health in every other way----except for the bronchial disorder (complicated by a minor but persistant post-nasal drainage) The third volunteer was an 81 year old male, completely non-responsive to all therapies for bi-lateral pneumonia of a bacterial nature. This condition had persisted for 6 months and he was approaching a moribund state, very rapidly. 24 hours after beginning this protocol, he encountered a very serious crisis evolving from major Herxheimer's Reaction. Pustule formation was so rapid and intense, 100% oxygen support was required----and the treatment protocol was suspended for two days, while the volunteer's condition was stabilized. Two days after resumption of the Oxygen-CS protocol, no supporting O2 therapy was required as the subject was fully able to breathe adequately unassisted. The volume of sputum/pus fluid was massive. Excepting very sore chest area (from prolonged coughing) the volunteer was much improved. Within five days he became very alert and began to overcome his narcoleptic tendencies. Within ten days he became ambulatory again. Within 15 days his lungs were unobstructed enough he could breathe fully, with no audio evidence of fluid presence in the pulmonary tract. Yesterday (the 21st day) his lungs checked to be 90% clear, with only one tiny spot in the lower left quadrant of the left lung. His M.D. pulmonary specialist is in a state of "schock" over the developments. His analysis is this is the most pronounced case of "spontaneous remission" in his 30 years of practice. No one has informed the M.D. of our experimental protocols, used on this volunteer. Our volunteer's immediate family is so irate over the fact that his alleopathic pulmonary "team" was totally unable to reverse his decline toward immediate life-departure (the crisis management team did offer to place him on 100% life support until clinical death) they wanted to instigate some form of legal action. We reminded them of their earlier agreement with us, that regardless of the outcome of our experimental protocol, "neither the procedural result nor the protocol itself, would be broached with the volunteer's alleopathic counsel". Additionally, based upon the anecdotal nature of this one case, there is no way to prove efficacy. THE PROTOCOL; This consists simply of using a nebulizing system constructed from a conventional artist's air-brush assembly, with modified pneumatic plumbing facilitating its connection to a pressure-regulated pure O2 supply. The air-brush mechanism was chosen because it provides an exeptionally economcal means of furnishing a very small particle aerosol fog (4 micron vicinity). Using a very simple adapter from the air-brush pressure regulator, to the O2 supply hose coupling, plus a standard welding system size oxygen fitting (female), the assembly is connected directly to the Oxygen port outlet from either a small medical-type O2 bottle---or a standard welding system O2 bottle outlet (they both contain the same purity oxygen). Using the small fluid-supply bottle which comes in the air-brush kit, then filling the supply bottle approximately 3/4ths full (about 1/2 ounce) of 5 ppm CS, we were ready to start. The O2 system (we used two-stage regulators) was SLOWLY set for constant regulation at 35 psi, at which point the system was ready for use. We placed the air-brush in the hand of the volunteer, who in turn pressed the push-valve button when they wanted to direct the O2/CS fog mixture into their mouth-----and inhale directly into the pulmonary system. At the end of each inhalation, the volunteer simply released pressure on the button and shortly exhaled. This procedure was repeated until the entire contents of the air-brush supply bottle was below the intake point of the supplu-siphon tube (about 50-75 breaths total). This protocol was employed twice daily (24 hours) for the entire duration of these researches. I will post the bill-of-materials, plus assembly details in another post sometime tomorrow. However, as a word of encouragement for those unable to afford the $680.00 for a hospital-type nebulizer, the total cost of our assembly, less the oxygen bottle and regulator, was less than $20.00. Additionally, our particle size was BETTER from the $10.85 Taiwanese bargain-brush, than from our $680.00 hospital-grade nebulizer (at least our measurements indicated so). I will. also, tell you where you can purchase these air-brush kits . We have, already purchased 20 of them; outfitted them, and given them to very needy Experimental Volunteers of a charity nature. Within the next 8 weeks, we should have some useable "raw" data, which I will attempt to share with interested list members. Please forgive this lengthy post, but my excitement over this exceptionally low-cost----and promising protocol, has been keeping me awake nights......lately. May you all be well. Sincerely. Brooks Bradley.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Dear List Members. There is a POSSIBLE modification that may be required......for those of you who are actually constructing the system I posted earlier. It involves the 1/4 inch Compression X 1\8 inch NPT pipe fitting. and the Pressure Regulator of the Airbrush system. There is a synthetic rubber "O-Ring" seal located in the bottom of the disc-shaped regulator assembly. Sometimes, the regulator-end of the hose fitting does not bottom properly against the "O-Ring", thus allowing a small O2 leak at this point. The solution is to obtain a second "O-Ring" (from any hardware store) and install it on top of the first "O-Ring". This will solve the problem. (Take the old "O-Ring" with you for proper size gauging). One other point; it is not necessary to run at 35 psi O2 pressure for satisfactory results----in fact, many prefer to run around 20 to 25 psi. 35 is the UPPER LIMIT of operation, for satisfactory use of this system. A word of caution for persons contemplating constructing any form of "home-built" device; a very important consideration is TRANSPORT FLUID (O2 or air) ATOMIZED PARTICLE SIZE. The larger the particle, the more likely for it to agglomerate (attach to) with its neighbor. For this reason I would caution all Experimentors NOT TO INHALE either air or O2 as transporters using conventional throat atomizers. Besides causing excessive and uncomfortable coughing, the particles are, simply, too large to yield any reasonable degree of penetration into the deeper portions of the pulmonary network. Please remember these are RESEARCH protocols and are not intended to be used as any; form of medical practice. Sincerely. Brooks Bradley. -- MZ¡ -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
--- End Message ---
