On 5/2/07, Terry Chamberlin <tcj...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
The great effort he made to cause the unscientific to come to the conclusions he wanted them to (that their product was fundamentally different than and superior to anything else on the planet) did more to convince me that, were my product (or almost anyone else's) to have been that used in their testing, the results would have been similar.--
Yes. I'm afraid I'm not technical enough to comment on a lot of what he said but I did study research methods and some of his statements made my hackles rise - they were so misleading. For instance his claim that his product would not kill friendly bacteria in your digestive system. this may well be true but the statement doesn't bear up to analysis. For instance it could mean that the product doesn't kill friendly bacteria period or it could mean it doesn't kill any bacteria in your digestive system which I tend to believe is more probable. Also his claims of all the things that were cured in African hospitals including retro viruses. I'd like to know exactly what they mean by 'cured'. I wasn't aware that anyone would claim a 'cure' for these so I'd like to now what tests were done. And wasn't his story about his kid cute and designed to play into the fears of all parents without actually telling us anything. Very clever psychology. I'm quite happy to stck to my little nine volt batteries and my silver wires. Kirsteen
