Hi Terry,
I felt the same way as you did Terry. It would have been more
convincing to me if their research compared their product to the EIS
made from a competent CS generator. Now that would be interesting.
One point they made was that the size of particles was not so important
as direct contact of a pathogen and silver was unnecessary. He said
something about the "frequency" emitted by their nanoparticles was
sufficient to produce results without contact. OK, whatever. I'd sure
like to peruse his patient and see more on that effect. Do you know the
name of the company/entity holding the patients?
Fred
Terry Chamberlin wrote:
Dee said,
Excellent video and very convincing, although it
would make people wary of other products other than
the one being sold <
That was my complaint. The speaker manipulated the
audiences impressions. He never SAID that all other
products were dangerous or ineffective, but he implied
it (plausible deniability).
He started right off by defining 'ionic' as a chemical
process, which CAN be accurate. But, in fact, 'ionic'
simply means a particle with a charge, whether caused
by a chemical or electric process (as we do). From
that point on, I knew not to trust him, as he either
was not the authority he claimed to be, or else he was
in fact deliberately misleading his audience, which he
was. He made the distinct point that everybody else
but them uses DC electricity to brew their CS, then
referred to 'ionic' as coming from a chemical process,
which would NOT be a DC process.
The great effort he made to cause the unscientific to
come to the conclusions he wanted them to (that their
product was fundamentally different than and superior
to anything else on the planet) did more to convince
me that, were my product (or almost anyone else's) to
have been that used in their testing, the results
would have been similar. If I had the money to buy EPA
officials, I could do what they are doing (they are
owned, in fact, by Clifton Silver Mines).
It was the same ole Barnum & Bailey type of marketing,
conning the gullible, taking advantage of the
listeners ignorance and lack of familiarity with the
subject to misguide (deceive) them into coming to the
right conclusions, promising wonderous results and
threatening dire consequences for even considering the
competitions products. The ole Carrot & Stick ploy.
To have to resort to this kind of marketing hype
convinces me of the validity of our own home-made
stuff even more. Methinks Thou Dost Protest too much
(or too dishonestly).
Terry chamberlin
Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane with All new
Yahoo! Mail: http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
.
