faith gagne wrote:
Mitt Romney states that the new health law is modeled on the state's
policy of requiring auto insurance. How can one argue with that? Is
required auto insurance unconstitutional?
No, they license you and the cars to drive on public roads. Thus they
can control who and what is allowed on the roads quite legally. They
cannot force you to license yourself or car, or require insurance if you
only drive on private property, such as your farm. They do not license
you to live, and do not provide you with the air, water, or food free of
charge to keep you alive, thus they should have NO requirement as to
what you do with your life.
Marshall
Faith
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Jester"
<tansta...@libertytrek.org>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: CS>New Law in Massachusetts
On 10/26/2007, faith gagne (jitte...@gis.net) wrote:
Massachusetts (Taxachusetts) has made a new law starting July 1,
2007 stating that all residents age 18 and over must have health
insurance or face stiff tax penalties. I don't have to worry about
it because I already have insurance, but I am outraged.
what is more outrageous is that no one has challenged this 'law'
yet... its UNConstitutional on its face. I'd have a lot of fun with
that one.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
