Kind of like when they told us terrorists were responsible for 9/11. Kurt
Scott <[email protected]> wrote: They want people to keep their faith in the pharmaceutical industry. I really am skeptical as to whether they took the mercury out at all. If they did, they definitely will put it back in. The biggest things they want from the public is their money and their trust. We are such a gullible society that we will give them both without even questioning them. Go figure. So I think you answered your own question. Dianne France <[email protected]> wrote: In Prevention magazine, October 2007, they had this article " Fear: Mercury Fact: A few years back researchers raised the concern that people (especially babies) might accumulate a toxic dose of mercury, from thimerosal, a vaccine preservative that consists largely of the metal. To be on the safe side, thimerosal was removed from many pediatric vaccines. But since then, studies have shown that the form of mercury found in the preservative, athyl mercury, does not build up in the body." I guess they are trying to convince us that mercury is okay. Safe would be none. Does this mean they removed it but plan on putting it back? Dianne In His Service, Scott Young <>< "The ultimate healing is death." - Elisabeth Kugler-Ross __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
