I used to work for a horse vet, and he told me that it is a potent
solvent, which is why it is so useful as a topical agent to carry
medications for horses and other animals. He suggested I use gloves to
handle it, as it carries lots of things inside the body with it when it
goes, and he felt it was necessary to clean the area of the animals
skin well before applying it. Since he had the practical experience
dealing with it on a daily basis, I believe him, I feel no need to read
up on it since I have no plans to use it at this time.
If you understand how solvents work, it is not just dependent on the
molecule size, but often on an oil/water basis, on occasion it is on an
acid/ base difference. Substances dissolve into it. Come to think of
it, it is probably water based, since we cleaned up with water, so it
may be dependent on the acid base balance, not sure. I am not sure I
believe that statement about molecule size, it may be just a theory
about how it works, similar to the candida theories, which are dicey. I
felt the candida people really had no sound basis for their beliefs
about how it worked or some of the protocol, but enough of it worked
that people felt some relief. In point of fact, many infections that
are called candida are actually caused by other pathogenic fungi, and
some of them produce potent toxins that can be disabling. Anyway, I
usually take some convincing before I will admit that a theory is
correct, even if the protocol works. The outcomes are often, in my
opinion, not so relevant to the theory of how it works. We humans love
to have explanations for things, and are very creative in coming up
with them- which is a good thing. Only in refining the theories by
trial and error do we usually come to know something.
Kathryn
On Jan 16, 2008, at 8:08 AM, Saralou wrote:
Not at my list e-addy so can't reply on list but.....
DMSO only caries molecules that are smaller than itself. Most dirt is
not. Sol knows of which he speaks. Go read Jacob, please. He's the
primary DMSO researcher.
Saralou
Clayton Family <clay...@skypoint.com> wrote:
It is a solvent. It might kill viruses, though, dunno about that.
On Jan 15, 2008, at 10:32 PM, sol wrote:
> It depends on the molecular size of the various smoke residues in
the
> lungs. DMSO will not transport anything over a certain molecular
size
> (wt? I may not be using the correct term). I forget what that size
> limit is but viruses are too large to be transported by DMSO so that
> might give you an idea.
> See info at www.jacoblab.com for details on molecular size of what
> DMSO can transport into tissues. I don't know where to get info on
> molecular wts of smoke toxins.
>
> Interesting point to raise though, as it is something I never even
> think of, as I live smoke free.
> sol
>
> kayedoe wrote:
>> I FELT COMPELLED TO RAISE A FLAG OF POTENTIAL BODILY HARM USING
DMSO
>> FOR NEBULIZING
>>
>> If you are a smoker you would not want to use DMSO to nebulize
would
>> you?????
>>
>> Please correct me if I my understanding is off but the DMSO would
>> drive the toxins from the lungs (from smoking) deeper into
surrounding
>> tissues, would it not?
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
