This is the product's patent. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,135,195.PN.&OS=PN/7,135,195&RS=PN/7,135,195
I hope someone can scan it and tell me if it is different from EIS. On Jan 28, 2008 7:26 AM, Clayton Family <clay...@skypoint.com> wrote: > I don't know about that, but I do know that I made and used about 5 PPM > for the first year or so that I used cs, and it worked great. I > believe it is not the actual ppm, but the amount of silver total- so if > it is 5ppm, you just use more of it, more often. Perhaps the product > is different? > > kathryn > > On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Sharlene Miyamura wrote: > > > Would the level of ppm have any bearing on it's effectivenss on > > whether it is a virus or bacteria? > > I've heard another forum that the higher the ppm is, the less > > effective it is on a virus but more effective on bacteria. > > Is there any truth to this? So some are preferring to go with the > > 10-14 ppm rather than the 18 ppm. > > > > Thank you for any information you can provide. > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com > > The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > > >