This is the product's patent.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,135,195.PN.&OS=PN/7,135,195&RS=PN/7,135,195

I hope someone can scan it and tell me if it is different from EIS.


On Jan 28, 2008 7:26 AM, Clayton Family <clay...@skypoint.com> wrote:

> I don't know about that, but I do know that I made and used about 5 PPM
> for the first year or so that I used cs, and it worked great.  I
> believe it is not the actual ppm, but the amount of silver total- so if
> it is 5ppm, you just use more of it, more often.  Perhaps the product
> is different?
>
> kathryn
>
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Sharlene Miyamura wrote:
>
> > Would the level of ppm have any bearing on it's effectivenss on
> > whether it is a virus or bacteria?
> > I've heard another forum that the higher the ppm is, the less
> > effective it is on a virus but more effective on bacteria.
> > Is there any truth to this?  So some are preferring to go with the
> > 10-14 ppm rather than the 18 ppm.
> >
> > Thank you for any information you can provide.
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
>
> The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
>
>
>