Wayne: I agree totally with what you're saying, I don't give a hoot about the patent anyway. My main reason for writing was if anyone had heard about the low level of ppm affecting the virus more effectively than the bacteria, but I guess not. I thought by sending the patent someone could look at their process and see if it differs from what you all are doing. Kathryn answered that saying it is high voltage electrolysis. Thanks Kathryn.
On Jan 28, 2008 6:55 PM, Wayne Fugitt <cwa...@netdoor.com> wrote: > > >18 ppm and silver gel through this company that owns the patent. The > >patent holders also sell the 10 ppm on the general market but I was told > >that the 10 ppm would be better for viruses and not to mention much > cheaper. > > The patent is a fraud, worthless, and more. > For one simple reason, it cannot be enforced. > > The patents I have seen, state very clearly, > > "this patent forbids all other some making, selling, or using". > > Not tell me how many times per day that patent is violated. > > It is almost like a patent on distilled water when everyone in the world > knows how to make it and half the people do. > > Wayne > > =============== > > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com > > The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > > >
