Einsteins "Spooky action at a distance"
IOW..there are no "other" places and everything including space and time
itself, is an illusion made by the perception OF it through awareness
elimination as a filter where seeing anything at all depends entirely on
near blindness to everything else. Speed limits don't apply when
everything only *appears* to move, but nothing actually moves, being
actually everywhere all at once, or "nonlocal"
That something can be perceived AS out there, doesn't prove that an "out
there" even exists...nor does it show where "IN HERE" is.
When you dream, "you" create entire populated universes to believe that
your are in, convinced that you are in them by the perception OF them..then
you wake up and know better. *As above, so below*
How do you know that you are awake NOW and aren't just dreaming yourself in
THIS universe? You can't know...but you can wake up to another level and
realize that dreams have no creative limits and no matter how sketchy the
proofs, you always believe yourself until you proof yourself mistaken to
your own investigation stopping satisfaction. Now, don't you think you are
wrong?? I thought not.
The only power required to create entire self validating universes is the
ability to deny that you can. That is the function that the senses, bourne
of limits on sensory apprehension, serve...and it works REALLY
WELL...exactly as really well as reality itself, I do believe....and cannot
not believe to some degree and remain existent.
Not only do I fool myself, I MUST fool myself in order to perceive a self
to fool.
Science has progressed almost to the point of proving that science is
just a more repeatable version of bullshit...a story telling itself a
validated story about fanciful limits.
"Magic" is the same thing, only not as repeatable.
"They" CAN get *here from there*..there IS no there that isn't here. WE
can't get *there from here* because we haven't yet proven to ourselves to
our own satisfaction that we are already there...yet, we continuously
travel the dimensions in unguarded moments while not believing that we
have. We simply don't have a context to place the input into that leaks
through the perceptual filter guards....as of yet.
But in one of those unguarded moments, you may find yourself more awake,
in a greater disbelief, too real to forget...WITH.. a version of
yourself appearing as some one else, there to explain it to you.... so you
won't forget. [The "Watcher" ]
Applied belief is a screening activity that takes enormous defensive
energy. Applying energy to disbelief is the same action. Forget in order
to remember. Forgetting is not something that can be "done", it's
something that's undone only by application of zero effort. Like, forget to
remember in order to remember.
Remembering the forgotten and denying a memory is not the same thing.
Denial takes constant effort of guardianship. Remembering the truth that
allows the possibility of a denial is absolutely effortless. ["The truth
will set you free" But being absolutely a matter of limitless choice, THAT
is SCARY!!! ..so, limits are re-chosen in self defense. ]
In dualistic limits perception, it's all too often "all or nothing" used
and defended to deny insecurity in order to think oneself secure ...and
"right".
The Reality is, "all AND nothing".... are one and the same.
Being wrong is the greatest gift possible... "true" insecurity, is not
possible.
Defenselessness is the greatest power there is.
It is the "power of" in it's purest form, that transcends form itself.
"Power over" is merely a defensive sub set. A useful tool of denial that
makes limits, and by extension, form....seem real...with space and time,
it's playground of validation events.
Said another way: Nouns do not exist, they are only implied by verbs and
adjectives.
So, what does that make a personal pro noun, but a professors self
description as a place to put a period of time at the end of, while
serving a fantasy of a life sentence?
"Made" [apparently] real... by denying who wrote it...with a great deal of
effort.
Ode
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/may98/893249215.Ph.r.html
Before I get into the heart of the matter, let me say that my main source
for this is J.J. Sakurai's classic Modern Quantum Mechanics (for my money,
this is *THE* best book on quantum) and various sites on the Net
(bookmarked
<http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/may98/893249215.Ph.r.html#bookmarks>below).
The interesting thing about this is that Sakurai's book is a graduate text
(albeit very readable) whereas the links only talk about it at the popular
level. I'm guessing that there are probably intermediate books out there
that address this but I'm sorry to say that I can't refer you to any of
them as I don't personally know of any. However, if you try a search on the
net for Bell's Inequality, you should get better results than for just
spooky action or teleportation.
<http://www.laurin.com/Content/Jan97/techAlice.html>http://www.laurin
.com/Content/Jan97/techAlice.html
http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~dzierba/HonorsF97/Week1/NYTJ uly22.html
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1997-12/11/180l-121197-idx.html>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1997-12/11/180l-
121197-idx.html
http://www.newscie ntist.com/ns/970628/nlight.html
<http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/1997/Aug/hour1a_080197.html>http:
//www.sciencefriday.com/pages/1997/Aug/hour1a_080197.html
Okay, let's get started. The phenomenon you talk about is sometimes
referred to as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox although Einstein is
said to have called it, with his characteristic wit, spooky action at a
distance. The reason this has a rather sarcastic tinge to it is that
Einstein didn't like the non-local aspects of quantum theory, which are
expressed in this paradox. Quantum mechanics is inherently a non-local
theory; i.e., one in which an action at one place is transmitted
instantaneously to another.
So what is this effect? It is the idea that two quantum particles can
become "entangled" and somehow mirror each others' states. Usually this is
associated with measuring one aspect of their state (e.g., their spin in
the x-direction, which is, say, either up or down). One of the basic tenets
of quantum mechanics is that before a particular state of a quantum
particle is measured, all possibilities are equally likely. That is, the
particle is said to live in all the possible states at the same time. But,
when you actually measure a particular state, the wave function collapses
to one possibility, that which was measured. As an example, say you have an
electron which can have spin pointing up or spin pointing down in the
x-direction. Before you measure it, you can't say whether the spin is up or
down. The electron's spin state is described as being in a superposition of
all the possible states (in this case, up and down).
But, and this is the weird part, when you decide to go ahead and measure
the electron's spin in the x-direction, you get either up or down. But not
both. It goes from having all possibilities existing at the same time
(i.e., spin up and down) to just one actuality (say, spin down). The wave
function collapses from all possibilities down to one, that which is
measured. Of course, you couldn't predict which state it was going to end
up in until you actually measured it.
So what does all this have to do with spooky action and entanglement? When
two particles become entangled, it turns out that they mirror each others
states. If one is measured to be spin up in the x-direction, it's partner
will necessarily be in spin down in the x-direction (when it's measured).
But, until you measure one or the other of the pair, you can't say anything
about their state. Imagine that you have two electrons that you've managed
to entangle somehow. Then you fire them off in different directions, one to
your friend Joe, in California, and the other to your friend Jenny, in New
York. You can't say anything about their spins because you haven't measured
them yet and all states are equally likely. But then Joe, in California,
decides to measure his electron's spin in the x-direction and finds that it
has spin up. This immediately collapses the wave function of Jenny's
electron and, whenever she decides to measure it, she will find that it has
spin down in the x-direction. This action (Joe's measurement of his
electron influencing Jenny's electron) is kinda spooky because it's
instantaneous! Understandably, this makes a lot of physicists, including
Einstein, a little uneasy.
How to explain this away? A lot of people have come up with many inventive
theories to sort of explain this aspect of quantum mechanics. Some have
said that the whole probabilistic foundation of QM needs modification;
others invoke Heisenberg's uncertainty principle; and still others have
pointed to hidden variables, either local or non-local, that we are unaware
of that influence this interaction. And some have decided to forego QM and
pursue alternative theories to explain the physics of the small and fast.
The most successful have been Bohm (who went back to a formulation of QM
that was based on DeBroglie's original concept of pilot waves) and Bell
(who decided to show that it wasn't possible for there to be any local
hidden variables). Bell came up with, appropriately enough, Bell's
Inequality, based on the idea of local hidden variables (which Einstein and
crew endorsed). However, it has been shown by various experiments that
Bell's Inequality does not hold and so QM is saved once again (at least for
a while). But, there are people who believe that Bell's Inequality needs
modification and still others who are pursuing the possibility of non-local
hidden variables.
As you can tell, this is a very complicated field. The reason I went into
all this detail was because of the information aspect of your question. You
asked if it was possible to transmit a morse code through this phenomenon
and the answer seems to be yes and no (welcome to quantum mechanics!). In a
recent experiment, researchers did something similar to sending off an
entangled pair of photons (instead of electrons) to Joe and Jenny. But,
instead of having Joe measure his electron's state, they fired another
photon (call it Steve's photon, all the way from Texas) at Joe's photon (in
California), entangled these two, and then measured the states of these two
newly entangled photons. The act of measuring them destroyed both Joe and
Steve's photons. And the measurement showed that Joe's photon had the
opposite polarity (state) of Steve's photon. But, since Joe's photon was
also entangled with Jenny's photon, Jenny's photon had the opposite state
of Joe's photon... and hence the same state as Steve's photon. This has
been referred to as teleportation in the media but, as you can see, it's
quite different from Capt. Kirk being beamed up by Scotty.
So how does all this relate to your morse code idea? It shows that in order
to transmit any information, you have to know what happened at the other
end. For example, if Jenny is sitting in New York, measuring the state of
an endless stream of electrons, all she sees is a random distribution of
spins (up, up, up, down, up, down, down, etc.) but she has no way of
correlating this to what Joe wants to convey in California. For example,
following your idea of only using certain electrons to convey the
information, she has no way of knowing that Joe didn't want to use the
first three electrons transmitted as part of their agreed upon code.
Another aspect of this is that there is no way to really predict or control
ahead of time the state information. The entanglement is dependent on a
quantum superposition of states and as soon as you know one of the states,
the other is instantly set, thus destroying the superposition of states.
Thus, even if Joe tells Jenny to only look at every 3rd particle's state,
he still can't control what state it will be in and the sequence ends up
being random once again. So you couldn't really send a morse code because
that would imply knowing the sequence of ups and downs before you observe
them.
However, this is an area of active research and many people are trying to
make quantum computers that calculate using this quantum superposition of
states instead of the ones and zeros that conventional computers use. Still
others are working on using this "quantum teleportation" to make the next
generation of encryption (where such cryptographic methods can be used to
make "totally secure" transactions). These "super-codes" work by having one
party (the bank) having a transmitter and the other parties (Joe and Jenny
again) each having a receiver. The bank sends out a (random) sequence of
particles; both Joe and Jenny measure the spins of their respective
particles, thus getting a random sequence. Joe uses this random sequence to
carry out a series of mathematical operations to encipher the message.
Jenny uses the reverse sequence to decipher the message. Each letter ends
up having it's own unique key and the message "pad" is used only once and
destroyed. Thus, although it doesn't seem likely to be able to transmit a
morse code using this phenomenon, it is possible to utilize it in other
ways. There are many theoretical aspects of this that need to be worked out
and many researchers are actively studying the theory in addition to the
technological applications of this. "
More?
http://www.r-haas.de/v4.html
At 10:25 AM 6/11/2008 +0900, you wrote:
Could you make clear what you're referring to here? Thanks in advance.
On Friday, Jun 6, 2008, at 00:15 Asia/Tokyo, Ode Coyote wrote:
Science has recently proven that communication is not limited by time
OR space.....an opening into a whole new set of rules should "brains"
connect well and openly enough to hold that concept without conflicting
in into non reception.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1495 - Release Date: 6/10/2008
5:11 PM
