Re: CS>Best Teeth Whitener Found...FOR PENNIES.

[Brooks Bradley]

The short answer is NO.....MSM is not a universal en-training agent and, hence, will
fall far short of enabling the necessary penetration of the tooth surfaces. The DMSO fraction did not cause any untoward conditions, what-so-ever, to arise in or around the treated areas (at least we did not detect any).
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.

---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------

Subject : Re: CS>Best Teeth Whitener Found...FOR PENNIES.

Date : Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:23:19 -0500

From : Alan Jones <alanmjo...@gmail.com>

To : silver-list@eskimo.com



This is very interesting, thanks so much for sharing it.



Question -- I have some MSM powder at home, could I use that instead of the

DMSO?



Alan





On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Brooks Bradley wrote:



> Several times during recent years we have conducted examinations of

> commercial products

> designed to whiten teeth. We experienced very limited success. However,

> recently, we completed a somewhat more detailed investigation and were able

> to find a single product which, did, indeed,

> display an excellent ability to whiten teeth, quickly---and to do so

> without attendant pain or discomfort...at least such was our results. I feel

> somewhat professionally uncomfortable, even juvenile, in stating the name of

> the product----Celebrity Sexy Teeth. In spite of its rather sophomoric

> identifier, this substance did, indeed, produce whitening improvements up to

> 8 shades

> among the volunteer population----sometimes within 10 to 12 days. Some of

> the other products had cost prices which would equal over $600.00 for a full

> treatment regime. None of these highly-hyped

> products equaled...or even approached....the effectiveness of the Celebrity

> product. All of the products which exhibited any useful effect, contained

> varying percentages of hydrogen peroxide.

> However, and this is the reason for my submitting this email.....we were

> able for a cost of mere pennies, to produce a simple mixture that was

> SUBSTANTIALLY more powerful than the Celebrity product (which, by the way,

> was not overly expensive). Our homemade solution was produced in light of

> the fact that we had determined the PRINCIPAL advantage of the Celebrity

> product seemed to lie in its superior ability to rapidly affect the deeper

> regions of the enamel.....than did any of its competitors. After simple

> variations in strength ratios between common commercial, drugstore hydrogen

> peroxide, and DMSO....we arrived at an acceptable compromise between user

> comfort---and rapid results. Our most acceptable mixture (all parameters

> considered) turned out to be one of approximately 80% (by volume) of 3.5%

> Hydrogen Peroxide (the standard drugstore variety) and 20% DMSO (full

> strength parent solution). One easy way for the novice to mix is to pour

> about 2 tablespoons o! f H202 in a very small glass and about 1 teaspoon of

> DMSO. Caution: As DMSO is highly hygroscopic, one should always pour the

> DMSO into the parent diluent. The actual method-of-use of this solution is

> at the discretion of the experimenter. Some persons simply hold about a

> teaspoon of the solution in their mouth and brush their teeth with a

> toothbrush for about 20 seconds. However, many persons are intolerant of the

> bitterness of this percentage of DMSO and/or cannot tolerate the gag-reflex

> sometimes presenting. Therefore, the most acceptable method among a majority

> of our volunteers was to simply use a common Q-Tip swab which had been

> enlarged by adding enough additional cotton to about double the size....dip

> it into the solution and "generously paint" the front surface of the front

> teeth. Effectiveness was enhanced by keeping the top lip above the treated

> surface for about 2 minutes. It was, also, worthwhile to paint the teeth a

> second time about 60 seconds into ea! ch protocol. A second 2 minute

> application became standard procedure for the voluteers during the course of

> this research investigation.

> Some of the volunteers utilized stronger H202 solutions (up to 6%) and some

> employed much stronger DMSO fractions (+20%). However, the one outlined

> above proved to be most effective.....and was DEFINITELY SUPERIOR to the

> commercial Celebrity product-----which was the only one of the commercial

> variety to yield acceptable results during our investigations.

> None of the volunteers experienced any untoward side-effects, whatsoever,

> while using the "paint on" method just outlined. A majority of our

> participants enjoyed quite rapid whitening and in shorter time-spans than

> with the Celebrity product. Incidently....at about 1/50th the cost.

> I hope some of the list membership will find this information of value.

> Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for

> discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at:

> http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to:

> silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to:

> silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List

> archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour









--

Alan Jones

-- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour