Resending:
> I don't consider you butting in at all Neville. I really do appreciate > you taking the time to give me your thoughts and direction because > everything I've learned so far has been from dozens of hours or > researching dozens of sites and trying to piece it all together. So I'm > feeling a little insecure that I've pieced the whole puzzle together > correctly. > > I'll clean those probes more regularly for sure! > > Thanks again and take care. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Neville Munn <one.red...@hotmail.com> > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Sent: Mon, February 22, 2010 5:47:21 PM > Subject: RE: CS>Confusion Making CS > > Excuse my butting in but the only way to *determine* anything with your > EIS is laboratory analysis. If you've got a pocket full of money and > are willing to get *several* samples analysed, go for it, but if not, > then don't worry about it, just keep using that meter. Jeez, if I > didn't know better I'd be thinking someone's trying to put the > frighteners up people again, only this time it's about meters. Meters > are NOT accurate, only laboratory analysis will result in any degree of > accuracy, but meters are the best to be had for the home producer, > regardless of their inaccuracies. uS readings are multiplied by > whatever figure you find in the public domain, pick one, there's plenty > to choose from out there. As with most things EIS related, there > doesn't even seem to be a consensus on THAT! If it's a ppm meter, then > just double that reading, how *accurate* does one want to be in the > backyard? Unless of course this place is exclusive to scientific types? > I used 3 meters for quite some time to compare each of em! And I did > that so I know I can separate myth from fact when marketers go on about > what meter to buy and what not to buy. And don't believe a *particular* > marketed meter will read EIS to the 'ppm', cos from my experience...and > laboratory analysis of several samples...they don't! Just keep using > that meter and aim for repeatable results, and recheck your solutions > each day for several days taking note of what goes on over time, and if > you find mud or gravel in the bottom of those storage containers...then > you're gunna have to reassess what your doing. And clean those probes > on that meter after every time you use it. Jeez, I think I must've got > outa the wrong side of the bed this morning! <g> N. > > > ________________________________ > > > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:01:20 -0800 > From: brfifi...@rogers.com > > So what is the best way of attempting to measure the silver you're > producing then? Or is there? >
