Isn't this where the H2O2 comes in?
Jaxi
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Neville Munn <one.red...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> I'm no chemistry guru so I can only speak in laymans language.
>
> The drop or reduction in ppm readings is a good indicator of purity of
> water used, don't be surprised if that reading drops almost 50% [based on
> literature and evidenced from experience].
>
> Some people may be surprised to see their readings seemingly drop
> significantly over time until the solution reaches a point of stability, I
> take that reading drop as a complement to the quality of water I'm
> using. If it failed to drop by an appreciable amount...then I have
> something else in the water besides silver. I believe the amount it drops
> is proportionate with the ppm level at cessation of the brewing process
> {based on my own experiences, the higher the end ppm result on production
> cessation, the greater the drop in reading} and I have had it drop near on
> 50% from initial reading on the day it was produced. Meters only give me a
> point of reference to shut my process down, I don't rely on them for any
> accuracy in silver content, just a ballpark figure {commonly referred to as
> a 'guesstimate'}.
>
> *Immediately* upon cessation of the brewing process the solution will be at
> it's highest in ionic content {positively charged silver ions} and as time
> goes by {few days praps} there will be a number of ions colliding with other
> ions forming atomic clusters {these would be called particles or particle
> clusters I guess}.
>
> The distinction between two solutions I referred to is just that...a
> solution which is high in ionic content, and a solution that has stabilized
> over time and has lost some of those ions to particle clusters, and I use
> whichever I consider will be most efficacious for a given circumstance,
> hence my comment about 'oils ain't oils' and 'EIS/CS ain't EIS/CS'.
>
> That's my backyard scientists way of explanation <g>, I'll leave it to the
> chemistry guru's to explain in better language and/or clear up any errors.
> But all I've said here is based on my experience over several years
> involvement with this 'stuff', not saying it's 100% accurate, just my
> experience.
>
> N.
>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:13:15 -0700
> > From: marmar...@bellsouth.net
>
> > Subject: Re: CS> New Member - Jan
> > To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> >
> > No -- lol -- I'll leave that one to Neville! There is some evidence, via
> our
> > Hanna Testers, that the ppm-level of CS/EIS will drop a ppm or two within
> a
> > couple days of brewing. Some refer to this as *stabilizing*. I believe
> that it
> >
> > is the contention of the knowledgeable members here that some of the
> ionic
> > portion of the brew will change over to particulate matter, resulting in
> a lower
> >
> > ppm reading. The real question is whether it's the ionic portion that is
>
> > effective in killing pathogens, or the particulate portion. Or is it
> both? I
> > don't know the answer -- for my own purposes, it doesn't matter. But
> apparently
> >
> > Neville feels differently, and he was sharing that with Jan. So I'm
> looking
> > forward to his answer, as I'm sure Jan is! :-)
> > MA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
> > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
> >
> > Unsubscribe:
> > <mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=subscribe>
>
> > Archives:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
> >
> > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
> >
> >
>
