This is what I would have said too.
Following on from this I would say a product ingested ASAP after production
will be high in Ag+ ions whereas a product that has been sitting for a time
will have lost a percentage of those positively charged ions to ionic clusters
or particles which don't have a positive electrical charge, and it would be
*this* type solution that would have been used for testing purposes I would
assume. As with most published material I've found, this part is never stated,
and I am of the belief the difference in solutions used for testing purposes
matters, and that's why there is so much written about 'colloidal silver' and
so little about the stuff we make because laboratories etc in their testing
procedures don't use a solution immediately after it's produced.
This leads me to two questions:
(1) The action, or interaction, of acids peroxides and ammonias with silver ion
clusters within the body? Do any/all or a combination of each, break down
those clusters and the positively charged ion is re-activated?
(2) What percentage of those Ag+ ions *are* actually lost in transit...All, or
only a percentage, leaving some to continue on their journey through the system
unchanged, or praps changed into something else? I believe acids form the
chloride, but what about peroxides and ammonias? What do they form?
And praps a question (3)...Do *all* particles convert to chloride? Or do some
pass on through? Maybe it depends on quantity or volume consumed at the time
{not forgetting the concentration level of Ag}? Remembering that these so
called particles are ionic clusters, which leads me to question (4)...Do ionic
clusters actually form an irretrievable solid silver particle, or can they in
fact be broken down again?
Answers to some of the above may be in the public domain. But what *type* of
product would they have been referring to? 'Colloidal silver' is not specific
enough for me.
Don't mind me, it's just my rambling thoughts.
N.
> From: bbane...@earthlink.net
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: CS>some info on BYU kill study
> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:10:46 -0800
>
> My guess is silver ions don't make it into the intestinal tract, and silver
> particles, if they do, are converted to silver chloride by the time they hit
> the intestines. Silver chloride doesn't have the killing power of pure
> silver.
>
> Bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David AuBuchon" <aubuchon.da...@gmail.com>
> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:47 PM
> Subject: Re: CS>some info on BYU kill study
>
>
> And some ASAP studies citing 16PPM EIS does NOT destroy probiotics.
> Going to have to give this one a thorough read and see if it is legit:
> http://www.nursedetective.com/market/safetysummary.pdf
>
> ~David
> http://scientificliving.net/
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:43 PM, David AuBuchon
> <aubuchon.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A list of 54 organisms that were tested:
> >
> > http://lifesilver.com/brigham.pdf
> >
> > ~David
> > http://scientificliving.net/
> >
> >
>
