Is there different .999 silvers? I have read that .999 is suitable for making CS. This stuff should be fine then? Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld
-----Original Message----- From: David AuBuchon <aubuchon.da...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:26:21 To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>.999 silver tubing in various widths: He said on his group .999 was his minimum. Plus I think this may be just a CYA statement. David On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Arnold Beland <abela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > mike that doubt I use WouldI > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:45 PM, David AuBuchon > <aubuchon.da...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> So Mike Monet was looking for this type of tubing for his generator. I >> was about to share it with him, but then discovered he had removed me from >> his silver forum for disagreeing with him...on a different forum that that >> one...go figure...Also, FYI, it turns out he is really suffering seriously >> from mold related illness and never brought it up here. >> >> >> http://www.riogrande.com/Product/999-Fine-Silver-Seamless-Tubing-Soft/100930 >> >> Anyway, some of you might benefit instead. I will definitely be trying >> this out in the future with Mike's super *Please Note: *Important! This >> fine silver is jewelry-quality, not medical-grade, material. Do not, under >> any circumstances, use Rio Grande silver material for colloidal purposes.low >> current ideas. These tubes increase surface area by a whole lot. >> >> David >> >> >> I doubt that Mike would" use anything of this low purity. Here is a quote > from the makers of this tubing: > > *Please Note: *Important! This fine silver is jewelry-quality, not > medical-grade, material. Do not, under any circumstances, use Rio Grande > silver material for colloidal purposes." >
