Yes that is correct. Consider a bunch of magnetics on a slick surface each repelling each other. If you shake one they all shake, but keep their distance. If you keep adding magnets then they will get closer together, and the repulsion on one side is partially cancelled by repulsion on the other side by another magnet. At some point they will start hitting each other. Now if they have glue on them, as you keep adding magnetics, at first they stay separate. At some point two will stick together, and each time you add another magnetic, two more will get close enough to stick together. So no matter how many magnets you add, at some point you stop getting more seperate magnetics, but instead just get bigger magnetics.
Now the harder you jiggle them, the further they have to be apart to keep from hitting each other. This translates into temperature for CS. So you may find that 10 ppm is perfectly stable and does not aggregate at 68 F (20 C), but that you can only maintain 5 ppm at 120 F. Marshall James Osbourne, Holmes wrote: > Me too, without any supporting documentation. > > I think the forces acting on the particle---the balance between repulsion and > attraction---shifts when they are forced closer together. > > Brooks....? > > Are you listening? Why the 5 PPM you consider optimum? > > James Osbourne Holmes > a...@trail.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marshall Dudley [SMTP:mdud...@execonn.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 3:03 PM > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: CS>5,10,20ppm? > > Hutt William J (Bill) DLPC wrote: > > > What is the recommended(consensus) ppm concentration should one ingest? 5 - > > 10ppm is what I am seeing on other web sites. They don't explain as to why > > 5 - 10ppm is the optimum concentration. How did they come up with this > > number? The web site www.silver100.com states that the number of ions are > > limited and you don't get any more above 10ppm. > > How critical are the ions as far as CS effectiveness? > > > > > > This coincides with our findings. Once you hit about 8 ppm, you don't get > more > particles but get bigger particles. From a theoratical standpoint the more > particles the better, the bigger the particles the worse. Larger particles > are > less stable (more likely to fall out of colloid), and less likely to make it > through the stomach lining into the blood stream, and less nimble. That is > why > I produce 5 PPM. I believe that the effectiveness of CS per ounce tends to > peak > in the area of 5 to 10 PPM, and drops off at higher or lower concentrations. > > Marshall > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
