Jonathan:
                 This phenomenon is  termed Psychic Transmutation by
paranormal researchers. Medical
scientists have now resorted to teaching patients to
visualise  and to make-believe  the motor or sensory functions of their
paralysed anatomy. The results are very encouraging.  The God-empowered gift
of visualization
 is unique in humans.Envisioning with great intent and desire to evolve
invokes a great channelling of energy bringing
about a " photonic kindling " to effect the crossing over from the etheric
to the material realm. This  morphic manifestation
is a result of the resonant collisions of sub-atomic particles creating
matter and giving rise to Form and Pattern with self-organizing  sympathetic
vibrations.  This  forms the basis of Prof Rupert Sheldrake's thesis on
"Morphic Resonance "

             Thoughts, as visible speech, heard in  silent reading,
meditation or dialogue, are vibrations of the bones, amplified in
mineralised body cavities. The water molecules
in the serous layers lining body cavities are great electromagnetic
amplifiers.

With regards
      Lew

Marshall Dudley wrote:
      <   I have proven using a scanning spectorphotometer that one's
thoughts can easily and consistently change the structure of water.  And if
you change the structure of the water you are using for the CS, then I would
fully expect that there would be an effect on the colloidal silver
production.>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan B. Britten" <jbrit...@cc.nakamura-u.ac.jp>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Speculation about variables in CS production


> For persons interested in the ideas Marshall Dudley expresses below,  a
> very interesting book is available:  Margins of Reality,  by Dunne and
> Jahn as I recall.   Both were at Standford, investigating effects of
> thougth on extremely precise computers.   They claim to have proved a
> very consistent and repeatable effect,  vanishingly small,  demonstrable
> only over a long period w/ very fast computer counters and such.    They
> found no "superstars,"  though husband/wife teams could do better than
> individuals in some cases.    I have had experiences similar to those MD
> describes,  but I can not get around the fact that the occurances may
> have been mere chance.   I simply do not know.   I am interested to
> learn more about this.
>
>
>
> Marshall Dudley wrote:
> >
> > I have proven using a scanning spectorphotometer that one's thoughts can
> > easily and consistently change the structure of water.  And if you
> > change the structure of the water you are using for the CS, then I would
> > fully expect that there would be an effect on the colloidal silver
> > production.
> >
> > About a decade ago when the IBM personal computer first came out, the
> > president of the company I was working for then demanded that we ship
> > them with our systems.  Procedures required that anything we ship meet
> > quality assurance, but the IBM personal computer was so poorly designed
> > an built that QC would not approve it.  The president forced them to
> > ship them anyway, but I had the very strong opinion that they were all
> > unreliable pieces of junk.  Well, we all got IBM computers to work with
> > in engineering, and mine would constantly bomb and lock up. I could not
> > do anything for more than a few minutes without it crashing.  They would
> > ship it back and get another one and it would do the same.  I would go
> > to the other engineers offices and see if they were having the same
> > problem, but they would all report that theirs never crashed, except
> > when I would go in and ask, then they would crash.  It got where I was
> > not allowed in the other engineers' offices when they were working on
> > their computers because they claimed I crashed their system.  Anyway,
> > they finally allowed me to build a clone computer for about 1/4th the
> > cost of an IBM, and it never crashed.  Finally all the computers in
> > engineering were swapped out to cheap clones, and none of the ever
> > crashed like they did before.
> >
> > It was many years before I realized that the expectation of them being
> > unreliable was what was causing the crashes.  There are many example of
> > this, such as the cold fusion experimentation where those that expect it
> > almost always get positive results and those who don't think it is
> > possible usually get negative results. (that is why this is called a
> > consensus reality, what is real is what the majority thinks is real!)
> >
> > Marshall
> >
> > James Allison wrote:
> >
> > > Considering there are people like Uri Geller in this wondrous
> > > universe, you may have a point  ;) -James
> > >
> > >      ----- Original Message -----
> > >      From: James Osbourne, Holmes
> > >      To: Silver-List
> > >      Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:38 AM
> > >      Subject: CS>Speculation about variables in CS production
> > >
> > >      Since it has been demonstrated that mental activity can
> > >      influence matter perhaps the mental state of the
> > >      experimenter may influence the production of CS.
> > >
> > >      James-Osbourne: Holmes
> > >
> >
> > --
> > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
> >
> > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
> > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
> >
> > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
> > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
>