Jason,
AVRA / Jason wrote: > > Craig: > > I'm the last one who would want to knock Frank Key's work. He makes an > excellent particle silver. I've personally learned a TON from him. But if > he states that's going to do anything for cancer, I'd like to know the > reasoning. She is only using it to prevent other viral/bacterial infections, and for Thrush/Candida. Frank Key has never made any claim period and I didn't say he did. And I didn't say it was being used to treat her cancer...What I said was: "Yes, it is expensive, but my sister has breast cancer and I am not going to muck about with unknown things for her." I also didn't say it wasn't being used to treat her cancer, hence the confusion. > Purchase the books "The Body Electric" and "Cross Currents" by Dr. Robert O. > Becker for an in depth understanding of the possible dynamics at work. Dr. > Becker formulated a theory as to why silver might, in some cases, positively > affect cancer. If he is right in his theories, then particle silver, unless > it converted to ionic silver in the body and at the point of cancer, won't > likely do much. Cancer is negatively charged. So how is the particle > silver going to effect the cancer? Not even an issue, not using it to treat cancer. > For your sister's sake, if nothing else, try not to listen ONLY to the > loudest voice, nor ONLY the most theoretically convincing voice. I appreciate your concern. > The silver particle supporters talk about ionic silver as if it's a done > deal that all ionic silver is converted to silver chloride in the body. > They are the ONLY ones to do so. I've never met a silver particle supporter > / ant-ion promoter ( exclusively silver particles ) that either didn't have > a financial interest, or were parroting those who do have a financial > interest. You are probably right...BUT: The silver particles definately don't get converted to silver chloride. > Furthermore, while there is some anecdotal evidence to suggest that > colloidal silver can have an impact on cancer, there is also anecdotal > evidence that suggests it does not. This likely means that in some > situations CS use can work, and in others, it doesn't. This suggests that > colloidal silver use is an excellent ADDITION to a full natural ( and/or > allopathic ) treatment protocol. She is under the care of a comprehensive multi-pathic group. She is not getting chemotherapy, but is receiving many other things, not limited to R/B and 6C EM+ treaments, QXCI scans, Biotron, EAV, hyperbaric oxygen, H202 IV, nutrionalist, hynotherapist, chiropractor, naturopath, and an MD. > No matter how hard I try, I can't see particle silver doing much for cancer. > I can't identify a method of action. I've seen situations where a > negatively charged substance has impacted cancer, but it was a GREAT deal > more of the substance, to the point where there is a generation of an > electromagnetic field, to do so. HOWEVER, I could be wrong. I'd be more > than open to hearing a theory on particle silver action on tumors. My own > research into cancer and silver has just begun. I have no theory. The CS is being used prophylactically. Again, I appreciate your concern and thank you for taking the time to inform me. Ciao, Craig -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
