I meant 38,000 cycles per second.  Thirty-eight
KC is force-of-habit.......I come from the age of "academic dinosaurs......a
time long before hertz replaced cycles.
                                            Sincerely,   Brooks Bradley.

"silversw...@yahoo.com" wrote:

> Do you mean 38 Khz? or 38,000 KHz?
>
> "That is, high energies at
> > these frequencies (we used 38 KC most frequently)
> > will dislodge microscopic
> > particulates."
>
> --- Brooks Bradley <brooks.brad...@worldnet.att.net>
> wrote:
> >                             Dear Petmc,
> >                     Many years ago I was associated
> > with a large (and
> > innovative) research and development firm.....we
> > conducted extensive design and
> > operational tests of varying untrasonic
> > designs----principally for cleaning
> > objectives.  One of the most distinctive effects of
> > using ultrasound for these
> > activities was that was a non-discriminatory
> > cleaner.  That is, high energies at
> > these frequencies (we used 38 KC most frequently)
> > will dislodge microscopic
> > particulates that a majority of other
> > means----sometimes including chemical
> > reactions----had failed to accomplish.  This being
> > the case I would caution all
> > experimenters to keep this characteristic in
> > mind-----and to ALWAYS subject the
> > intended containment vessel to an ultrasonic
> > cleaning itself (using distilled
> > water to the highest solution level anticipated  for
> > generating the CS
> > product).  This procedure should last from 3 to 5
> > minutes.  This is the most
> > convenient and reliable method for preparing your
> > generation vessel for an
> > acceptably-clean condition  for producing CS in such
> > an environment (at least,
> > this is my opinion).
> >         One other consideration worthy of possible
> > reflection........ultrasonic
> > energy's indiscriminate action insures that any
> > compounds and/or impurities
> > resulting from the generation process itself----will
> > be subject to
> > disassociation, size-reduction and distribution
> > throughout the liquid medium
> > being used to produce the CS........and this,
> > obviously, includes any materials
> > adhering to the container walls.
> >                                     Sincerely,
> > Brooks Bradley.
> >
> > brpete...@msn.com.au wrote:
> >
> > > As a user of the pulsed d.c. method of cs
> > generation,I have recently become
> > > curious as to any beneficial effect of ultrasound
> > frequencies applied to the
> > > colloidal process.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for
> > discussion of colloidal silver.
> > >
> > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at:
> > http://silverlist.org
> > >
> > > To post, address your message to:
> > silver-list@eskimo.com
> > >
> > > Silver-list archive:
> > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > >
> > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> http://news.yahoo.com
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>