Anyone want to answer this ? How much H202 and at what % to improve CS ? The strongest I have ever bought is 35 % food grade H202 , its kind of expensive. But how much do you need to put in CS ? Say a quart ? We can figure up or down from that. Do you think 3 % H202 in the brown bottle store bought would hurt anything...? Tel Dewey, AZ
MARIANO DELISE wrote: > For allof us non technical types, I believe you are saying what my body has > been telling me that it is advantageous to add H2o2...Is this correct? > Nancy > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ivan Anderson" <i...@win.co.nz> > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 6:05 PM > Subject: RE: CS>My CS test results > > > Thanks Rob, good work. > > > > The addition of H2O2 ionises any particulate silver and any Tyndal > > effect found in the 100% ionic batch needs further investigation, as > > discrete ions should not scatter the light beam. > > > > Ivan. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robb Allen [mailto:rube2...@hotmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 11:59 a.m. > > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Subject: CS>My CS test results > > > > > > Hello, > > > > >From the time I first started making my own CS I have > > occassionally had it tested at our local college. {atomic level > > tests} My latest tests that I had them do was to see if indeed > > whether or not H202 mixed at 1 drop for every 2 ounces did actually > > decrease the partical size. I had three tests done: > > 1. First a test on 1 gallon of my CS unaltered. > > 2. A test on a second gallon of my CS after adding 64 drops of H202 > > [I ordered this test to be done within 30 minutes of adding the H202] > > 3. A test on a third gallon of my CS after adding 64 drops of H202 > > after waiting for at least 24 hours. > > > > > > I have not received yet the paper showing partical sizes......but I > > did talk to them on the phone. First of all my CS unaltered was 75% > > ionic and measured 18 ppm. > > Tests 2 and 3 were dramatically different........number 2 was 88% > > ionic and 3 was 100%. This actually proves what I had suspected: that > > the reaction actually takes much longer to complete than what I had > > originally been told. I suspected this for 2 > > reasons.......first......the older my CS got after adding H202 it had > > less of a tyndall effect........and second.........the older it gets > > after adding H202 the stronger it tastes. > > I have some mixed H202/CS that is more than 2 weeks old and it hasn't > > precipitated or shown any other signs of "going bad"........anybody > > who doubts the advantage of adding H202 should have their own tests > > done. I'll post all of the numbers when I get them in the mail. Robb > > > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > >
