There has never been any evidence found at all to support the idea that
any species has ever transformed into another species on this planet be it
plant or animal. Other planets? We don't know. There is some evidence,
though not proof, that something like that has been going on whether it be
evolution or engineering. If it is considered, it does tend to fit a lot of
broken pieces into the puzzle with a lighter weight hammer.
Yes, there is a large amount of proof that several species of hominid
have existed on this planet in the past and that their and our genetics are
similar...but our genetics are very similar to a pig too. The FACT is, we
don't know how they [or we] got here. All we have is theories.
Paleontologists and establishments have tendency to lose things that
don't fit the theorys and lose the people that find them. The basement of
the Smithsonian are full of them..things like 3 million year old iron
hammers...12,000 yr old models of airplanes similar in design to our
own jets today....while the displays upstairs sometimes perpetrate items
that have been shown to be outright frauds and straws grasped in order to
build some semblance of a house for the theory to live on in when even
Darwin himself was becoming doubtful in his own lifetime.
By all evidence, our own history of origins is a great deal richer than
we dare to imagine and a lot longer and a lot more diverse.
But, we pay people to 'know' things because we just can't stand not to.
So, we wind up 'knowing' things that aren't exactly true in the face of
the other evidence which includes our own ancient written records that
spell it out, but are dismissed as myth when the spelling doesn't make up a
sentence that matches the official story.
If you read up on the story of finding the Panda bear and compare that to
the current story of and evidence found in the search for Big Foot, you can
see where the only certain thing is uncertainty. Tasmanian tiger? A
similar story of certainty reluctantly smashed to pieces and myths turning
into history.
Science can be quite off base and has been proven to be so many times
when things that don't fit surface enough to stare the scientists down.
It would behoove us to be very careful when observing the world around us
with ANY agenda in mind, be it establishment status quo OR conspiracy.
[Only Devils have hooves, right? The evil questioners who make the gods
look foolish.]
Be aware that the 'gods' of officialdom are not the only gods around.
Anti-officialadom is rife with 'gods' too.
Case in point....the silver 'myth'.
That's why we have this silver list, ey?
I think the only true statement that can be made is that we don't know
very much at all and that's something that's very difficult to
admit...especially for a specialist who is paid to be certain and stands to
lose a lot of face [and maybe his job] when proven otherwise.
ken
At 11:32 AM 3/3/2003 -0600, you wrote:
Gee, I thought that there was lots of
proof.....like, say, the advancement
of tools and tool making at
prehistoric excavation sites. Kit
At 10:27 AM 3/3/03 -0500, you wrote:
>
> OK, so we have a hypothesis of evolution. It certainly has not been
proven.
> That we can't imagine how it could be otherwise is only a comment on
>imagination.
>..seems we all have a big problem with, 'I dunno'.
>
>[not excluding myself]
>Ken
>
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
