Have you seen one turn into a grasshopper?
Perhaps you refer to the speckled moth Myth?
What about the butterfly?
If you look into Wilhelm Reichs work, he discovered what I think he was
first to call a prion.
According to him, It is an organized non living something that tranforms
into a virus, back into a prion and into a bacteria depending on its
environment.
Is it true, complete and completely accurate, or was it his fantasy?
I dunno.
He said and did lots of fantastic things that bend beliveability.
But it's still a non species turning into a species, not an advanced
species turning into another one.
..and I didn't say that was impossible, just that we have yet to find
evidence that it's happened 'here' without some intelligent intervention.
[and we don't have the ability to look elsewhere yet]
Ask a scientist about alien visitation and they'll say they can't get
here from there.
Well, we can't get there from here.
We have no idea what 'they' can do, have done, when or where, or to what.
..just a bunch of evidence that we don't know a whole lot.
Look into 'rods and critters' for a mind bender with evidence to support
it. [incidently, somewhat connected to Reichs work after he died by
Constable Treavor who attempted to carry on in the fifties]
But one mind bender doesn't prove another mind bender.
Ken
At 03:23 PM 3/4/2003 -0600, you wrote:
There has never been any evidence found at all to support the idea that
> any species has ever transformed into another species on this planet be it
> plant or animal.
What about the butterfly?
John.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ode Coyote" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: CS>New Germ Theory
>
> There has never been any evidence found at all to support the idea that
> any species has ever transformed into another species on this planet be it
> plant or animal. Other planets? We don't know. There is some evidence,
> though not proof, that something like that has been going on whether it be
> evolution or engineering. If it is considered, it does tend to fit a lot
of
> broken pieces into the puzzle with a lighter weight hammer.
> Yes, there is a large amount of proof that several species of hominid
> have existed on this planet in the past and that their and our genetics
are
> similar...but our genetics are very similar to a pig too. The FACT is, we
> don't know how they [or we] got here. All we have is theories.
>
> Paleontologists and establishments have tendency to lose things that
> don't fit the theorys and lose the people that find them. The basement of
> the Smithsonian are full of them..things like 3 million year old iron
> hammers...12,000 yr old models of airplanes similar in design to our
> own jets today....while the displays upstairs sometimes perpetrate items
> that have been shown to be outright frauds and straws grasped in order to
> build some semblance of a house for the theory to live on in when even
> Darwin himself was becoming doubtful in his own lifetime.
>
> By all evidence, our own history of origins is a great deal richer than
> we dare to imagine and a lot longer and a lot more diverse.
> But, we pay people to 'know' things because we just can't stand not to.
> So, we wind up 'knowing' things that aren't exactly true in the face of
> the other evidence which includes our own ancient written records that
> spell it out, but are dismissed as myth when the spelling doesn't make up
a
> sentence that matches the official story.
>
> If you read up on the story of finding the Panda bear and compare that
to
> the current story of and evidence found in the search for Big Foot, you
can
> see where the only certain thing is uncertainty. Tasmanian tiger? A
> similar story of certainty reluctantly smashed to pieces and myths turning
> into history.
> Science can be quite off base and has been proven to be so many times
> when things that don't fit surface enough to stare the scientists down.
>
> It would behoove us to be very careful when observing the world around
us
> with ANY agenda in mind, be it establishment status quo OR conspiracy.
> [Only Devils have hooves, right? The evil questioners who make the gods
> look foolish.]
>
> Be aware that the 'gods' of officialdom are not the only gods around.
> Anti-officialadom is rife with 'gods' too.
>
> Case in point....the silver 'myth'.
> That's why we have this silver list, ey?
>
> I think the only true statement that can be made is that we don't know
> very much at all and that's something that's very difficult to
> admit...especially for a specialist who is paid to be certain and stands
to
> lose a lot of face [and maybe his job] when proven otherwise.
> ken
>
> At 11:32 AM 3/3/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> >Gee, I thought that there was lots of
> >proof.....like, say, the advancement
> >of tools and tool making at
> >prehistoric excavation sites. Kit
> >
> >
> >At 10:27 AM 3/3/03 -0500, you wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, so we have a hypothesis of evolution. It certainly has not been
> >proven.
> > > That we can't imagine how it could be otherwise is only a comment on
> > >imagination.
> > >..seems we all have a big problem with, 'I dunno'.
> > >
> > >[not excluding myself]
> > >Ken
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
> >
> >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
> >
> >To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> >
> >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> >
> >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>
