What has this to do with Colloidal Silver?
Jim
Ode Coyote wrote:
The difference being
One side tries not to hit the kids...but they gotta shoot or die..or run
away.
The other side holds the kids up to see if they'll get hit. If mom
protests, she gets killed outright and the kid still gets held up as a
target/shield. [and we get the blame for both killings]
So here it is.
Mr Iraqi sez... If you stand on our military target, you might die. If
you don't, you WILL die.
Either way, if you die, we blame them.
The Iraqis claim 4000 dead civilians. How much you wanna bet they
killed 3500 [or more] in one way or another, quite on purpose..sometimes
because they refuse to fight?
..I mean, machine gun your own people while they flee from you?
Talk about being between Iraq and a hard place!
ken
At 06:00 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Errr, I'm getting lost. Who's Don?
I see something referred to by Kit, whose original post I don't have,
having
relegated her to killfile some time ago.
As far as the question goes about firing on /through human shields,
thats a
really tough situation. Another is, do you opt to save the baby or
your wife?
Life CAN be a bitch and choices HAVE to be made.
So turn it around, you're on a battlefield and being attacked by an
enemy force
using human shields shooting real weapons, and you are sustaining REAL
losses,
and in mortal danger yourself.
What would YOU do?
Answer the question.
Forget the BS, this is REAL!
Chuck
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:01:23 -0600, "d.linen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hahahahahahahahahahahaha Good one Don.
>
>Kit wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well.....gee...maybe we should clear this up
>> then.....are you saying, Chuck, that the
>> soldiers should fire anyway?
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
