Hi, Mike, I am not a doctor either, and I do not dispute the accuracy of your measurements or your report; I just wonder whether the conclusion -- that the new batch of CS was dramatically superior to the previous batches -- is correct. If so, it is good news for me, as I use a highly ionic CS (the SG6 constant current Silvergen model, with stirring, which is quite easy to use.)
As for lunar influence, which I have noticed several times but not strictly verified by experiment: this effect, if it is real, produces either more particles or more agglomeration of the same quantity of particles, with the observable result being a yellow color and dramatically higher TE. (Finally found my laser pointer and verfied that; the TE difference between clear and yellow CS is quite dramatic.) There is nothing mystical or nonsensical about lunar effects: most are quite obvious, ranging from tidal changes to menstrual cycles. For all concerned, your good results are good news, and I am glad for you personally and for anyone else who benefits from the report. Cheers, JBB Mike Monett wrote: > > url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60367.html > Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux > From: Jonathan B. Britten > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:26:27 > > > The information below is very interesting indeed. However, I can > > not help but wonder whether the apparently higher efficacy of the > > new-method CS was in fact merely coincidental, a result of the new > > CS being taken at a time when the virus was vulnerable, and > > further at a time following the use of "ordinary" CS which had > > rendered the virus much weaker. > > > From the information provided, it seems difficult to exclude this > > possibility. If there is a way to exclude this interpretation, it > > would be good to know. > > > JBB > > Hi Jonathan, > > I am not an doctor, and know little about medicine. But I am an > engineer, and I know a lot about making accurate measurements. > > I can confirm the current used to make the cs was constant to within > +/-2.5%, depending on the line voltage. > > I can confirm the brew time was accurate to within several seconds, > depending on what my hands were doing when the timer went off. > > I can confirm the fill level was constant to within 1/8 of an inch. > > The dw was from Walmart. Not the best quality, but very consistent. > I measured the initial voltage for most runs just to verify the > quality, and plotted the cv curve when I had time. There is no > reason to expect much variation in the cs. > > I made 8 oz each day. This was a religion. Nothing else happened > until the timer went off and I drank the cs, and my normal morning > coffee. > > The Shingles attack was in October, 2001. The normal cs killed it > very quickly. > > A low-level infection returned this January. It was in the same > general location, but a bit lower down. > > I made no change in my procedure of making cs, except to try > stirring. It did not work, the Shingles got worse, and I went back > to the normal cs. The Shingles returned to its previous level. > > Perhaps three weeks transpired, and things were pretty much the same > as before. Taking a shower produced the same level of pain. > > I got the idea to try to make a 9V generator, and posted the goal to > the list. I got my first results on Monday, and posted to the list. > > The response to the new cs was so dramatic and sudden, there is > little to account for it except the increased concentration of > silver ions. > > After discovering this, I changed to the new cs and started taking a > mouthful every three or four days, instead of drinking 8 oz per day. > > There have been no tingling sensations indicating the start of a new > Shingles infection, no trace of any cold sore infections, no pain > from cavities, and the teenager and her mother are completely clear > of any new infections. > > They both had been taking the 1.4 mA/sq. in cs before, but the > teenager got a serious infection. This cleared up when I switched to > the 87uA/sq. in. cs and put him on a regime of one mouthful every > two days. > > The indications are the same across the board. For all of us who > take it, the new cs is much better than the old. > > Others will have to try it and see how it works. I have posted the > necessary information in the ULVDC thread. > > I am not claiming magic or the phase of the moon. My interpretation > of the effect of the density of the ion cloud on the formation of > particles is well documented in the archives. > > An ion is an ion. The more of them, the better. > > Best Regards, > > Mike Monett > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
